To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right? |
From: | Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:14:23 +0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 23/02/2014 20:29, Tonno Vahk ES5TV wrote: <snip> Nothing wrong in using databases or brain, for god's sake. Really? No difference at all? It seems to me there is a lot wrong with using the internet for real-time remote database lookup while contesting. One possible way to reduce such abuse is to have one or more exchange elements which no database could know. Serials would do nicely. 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] It wasn't a QSO... Or was it?, Jeff Blaine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Cabstat won't process NAQP RTTY log, XV4Y (Yan) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?, Tonno Vahk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?, Rick Lindquist, WW1ME |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |