CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Handicap For Dirty Rigs
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:59:59 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 10/20/2014 2:05 PM, Stuart Phillips wrote:
BUT… as operators we have a choice of where we operate on the band.

Good operators RUN, and they Search and Pounce. When a dirty station wipes out 10 kHz of a band (as KE1B regularly does with a 7600 and legal limit amp 8 miles from me), he deprives me of the stations within that 10 kHz, some of which may be mults. And he makes it more difficult for our neighbor, K6XX, to qualify for WRTC.

One always has the choice to move - plus, a good operator with a good radio can pull signals out 
from the noise created by the “dirty” rig - yes, it takes time but that’s part 
of the required skill level.

But the guy with the dirty rig doesn't have that problem -- his trash pushes nearby competitors aside. And why should it be more difficult for me than for him?

But it still doesn’t address the grandfathered issue of older rigs - and likely 
never will.

I don't see an exemption in 97.307 (a), (b), or (c) for old rigs.

Bottom line -- it's rights and responsibilities. Read the Rules -- our licenses authorize us to operate with power levels up to 1.5kW, but 97.307 makes us responsible for producing a CLEAN signal, and not interfering with other stations outside the minimum bandwidth required for transmission.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>