CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying

To: 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying
From: Andy Melanin <ua3dpx@mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:48:35 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If it's not too late, I agree with Ranko!!
We really very busy not only with radio, but other life.
73! Andy UA3DPX
P.S. Radio is main thing off cause !!

Отправлено с iPad

> 3 дек. 2014 г., в 2:23, 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me> написал(а):
> 
> Hi to all,
> 
> I hope that some comments will be considered and Team selection criteria will 
> be changed a bit?
> 
> For me and all contesters whom I discussed with, obvious problem is having to 
> short selection period.
> 
> Ranking 12 contests , and making selection criteria in the way that mostly 
> SOAB are to be done is to much. Organizer counts seasons 2015/2016, and not 
> counting 2017? None of us can't see reasonable explanation for such decision. 
> We all suffered for qualifying for WRTC 2014 in Boston, dedicating ourself to 
> make 12 good scores, and we had 3 years for it. It was really hard - ask 
> anyone from EU or USA who did it. Now we have only two years for same number 
> of contests?
> 
> I have station capable to win and to assure place in qualification. I am 
> enough dedicated to spend unreasonable amount of time for hobby, but 
> honestly, it becomes to be so demanding and overmuch.
> 
> My proposal should be to:
> -Extend qualification period on 2017
> -Calculate eight best scores
> 
> It will give more chance to more contesters with average stations, and will 
> demand not quantity of scores - will demand higher scores and quality. Simple.
> 
> I know that this will be probably ignored, but is is common opinion of many 
> contesters and previous WRTC participants.
> 
> Also, as organizer has full right to make selection criteria whatever he 
> likes, it is better to invite teams by whatever criteria you like, instead 
> having bad selection criteria.
> 
> Now I am curious to see rules. Hope our German friends will be more open for 
> rules with more rooms for technical improvements. Hope all will agree that 
> this aspect of contesting is very important as well as operating skills?
> 
> 73
> Ranko
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>