CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Power Level

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Power Level
From: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:48:10 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Must be a slow news day. Why do we continue to create problems when none exist?

Lets alienate more people so they don't get on. Gosh that sounds like fun working less people.

I guess we should only count entries that work the entire time period, because those that get on for the last couple of hours to have fun, cannot be tolerated by those "serious" ops.

What is wrong with some of you?



W0MU



On 1/8/2016 10:19 PM, Bill via CQ-Contest wrote:
It would be really easy to maintain the purity of the NAQP as a contest between
100W no-Skimmer stations:

1) Remove the part of rule #15 that acknowledges the possible entry of HP 
stations.

2) Only count contacts between entrants of the contest. The 7 day entry deadline
    is not very rigorous. By submitting an entry, an op would be declaring that
    they were indeed 100W with no Skimmer use.

The few ops that got on for a few hours with a KW to have fun with "fast rates"
would have wasted the time of the serious competitors equally.

73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>