CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO Categories

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO Categories
From: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:33:01 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Right on Ria,

Could it be that some unassisted operators actually produce higher scores than many of the highly skilled assisted operators?

Maybe they are intimidated by this fact.

Guess the best way to deal with this is to get rid of the unassisted category and let them fully shine with their unique skills to point and click and work stations that others have found and presented for them.

But as we know it, unassisted still is King, long live the King!

Peter SM2CEW




At 20:13 2017-03-11, Ria Jairam wrote:

I'm not dismissing the fact that there is cheating - there is. But I am
puzzled why we have to use a sledge hammer to kill a fruit fly and why
people who aren't affected want to eliminate the unassisted category.

Ria
N2RJ


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>