Merging Assisted/Unlimited with multi-op?
73,
Mark, kd4d
On March 12, 2017 11:23:11 AM EDT, Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
wrote:
>5 days after contest is very long time.
>Best is 5 hours after contest.
>Or just immiadetly.
>Less cheaters.
>But i am for ONE SINGLE OP CATEGORY.
>NO ASSISTED.
>Sam LY5W
>
>
>2017-03-12 04:12 rašė:
>
>
>If CQWW merges SO and SOA then I'll pass on that contest. And I'll
>also
>pass on the CQ magazine subscription as well.
>Same goes for any other contest that combines SO and SOA.
>
>I don't have a problem with operating unassisted, but I am puzzled as
>to
>why others want to eliminate the SO category. And I don't care if you
>operate assisted if that is what you like to do. I have no interest in
>spots, skimmer, RBN, etc. I have looked at them yes, but I am not
>interested in using those during a contest.
>
>"The heavy handed CC action to deter cheaters is driving participation
>away". Yes Dale, me at least.
>
>"Then again I always got the sense that there was a movement to destroy
>the
>unassisted category for whatever reason". Yes Ria there is, I see it
>too.
>
>And then there is the 5 day log deadline that I do not like. I was
>asked by
>LU5DX (I think) to submit my CQWW CW log a few weeks ago, several
>months
>after the contest ended. He said it would help with the log checking,
>so I
>obliged and sent it in 3 months or so late. If sending a log in 3
>months
>late is okay with the log checker, then why the 5 day deadline? Why
>not at
>least include the following weekend? Or perhaps a 10 day deadline?
>
>73 Scott W2LC
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|