CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:42:37 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Gee, A perfect operator who has never made a mistake! It is a rare DX pileup when I don't hear well known and respected ops, including those who have been ops on major DXpeditions, accidentally calling on top of the DX station because, for one reason or another, he thought he was in split mode but wasn't. Anyone who says he's never done it is either in denial or a liar. :)

W5OV has stated quite clearly that the objective of the log checkers is to penalize cheating, not mistakes.

73, Jim K9YC

On Wed,4/19/2017 7:53 AM, ve4xt@mymts.net wrote:
If there is, as apparently there is, evidence of multiple incursions by US 
stations into forbidden band segments, in violation of US law, why zero DQs?


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>