| To: | cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Feb 2020 22:21:26 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 2/3/2020 5:56 PM, Doug Renwick wrote: You complain about increased noise levels. Radio equipment has also improved to handle noise. Only in advertising blurbs. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem, Edward Sawyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem, Doug Renwick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem, Yuri |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |