Actually you do.
73 Rich NN3W
> On Feb 7, 2020, at 3:26 PM, John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> " Hint: Don't call it a "contest." How about Activity Day?"
>
> Not a bad idea. Field Day clogs the bands more than any contest, but you
> never see the non-contesters complaining about FD.
>
> 73 John W5TD
>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:34 AM James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Breach of faith and trust" in whom? The elected so-called
>> "representatives" we sent to the 1979 WARC where the new bands got laid
>> out? The red herring of "placating non-contesters" stank then and it stinks
>> now.
>>
>> I agree with Doug Renwick and have thought for years that a single-band
>> contest on each of the new bands, once a year, would be a lot of fun and
>> might attract new people to use them. Hint: Don't call it a "contest." How
>> about Activity Day?
>>
>> Cain, K1TN
>>
>> No. For the breach of faith and trust alone, this is a terrible idea.
>> IMHO.
>>
>> 73, ron w3wn
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
>> To: 'CQ-Contest Reflector' <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Fri, Feb 7, 2020 8:26 am
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contesting is a thing now !
>>
>> I think a single band WARC contest would be fun. Say have a 30m or 17m or
>> 12m single band contest for a weekend; something like what is done with 10m
>> and 160m contests. Non contesters can use the non-WARC bands. Think about
>> it.
>>
>> Doug
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|