Seems likely to me that it was simple ignorance by the organizers. I've
seen a number of instances where inexperienced folks volunteered to
handle a state QSO party and had one of those "wouldn't it be great
if.we added something new..." ideas. Usually not this bad, but in
retrospect, I'm surprised this is the first time (that I can recall)
this has happened since WARC 1979.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 2/8/2020 4:27 PM, Doug Grant wrote:
Some years ago I was helping with a ham radio demo at a big Boy Scout
event. Things were going great then two contests started (WAG and CQP I
think). 10 and 15 got very full of contest activity so I decided to try the
“If you want to get away from the contesters, try the WARC bands” idea to
see if it really would work.
It was great! Had a bunch of excellent introductory QSOs on 12 and 17
meters with no QRM from those dang contesters.
I support the “no contests on 12/17/30 meters” policy.
The VTQP guys made a mistake and I hope they will not repeat it and that
nobody else makes the same mistake.
73,
Doug K1DG
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|