Thanks, that sheds a lot of light.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
To: "'Brett Hays'" <bretth@htonline.net>; "'Karlnet Mailing List'"
<karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:48 AM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter
> Brett,
>
> TurboCell DOES NOT do auto-fallback. That is an 802.11 function. This
> is why good RF is important: TurboCell will try to get a "weak client"
> in by allowing re-transmits.
>
> Speed of the Base is another matter. ASSUMING you leave the Base at
> full speed, it will connect to clients based the bandwidth speed you
> have allotted them. Various clients can have different speeds.
>
> Kevin
>
> **************************************
> Kevin R. Knuth
> Business Development Manager
> North America
> 260-424-9690 Regional Office
> 614-822-5275 Corporate Office
> kknuth@karlnet.com
> www.karlnet.com
> **************************************
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Brett Hays
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:57 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter
>
>
> This brings to mind a question I have been meaning to ask for a long
> time. Will a Turbocell client automatically adjust sensitivity or does
> it lock at the rate you set. In other words, if you set an RG at 11mb,
> will it train down to 5.5 or 2mb in order to maintain a connection or is
> it 11mb or nothing?
>
> Also, am I correct in assuming that the speed the access point will run
> at is the same as the lowest speed of any client connected.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Conn" <cconn@abacom.com>
> To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:51 PM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RE: Ping Jitter
>
>
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Kevin Knuth wrote:
> >
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > I appreciate your viewpoint, but we have seen examples where ping
> > > times grow into SECONDS, and that simply is NOT acceptable.
> > >
> > > Other than that, I do agree with your point!
> > >
> > > Kevin
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes, 1000+ms or more (for other reasons than base congestion) can be
> > indicative of other issues.
> >
> > I am still curious; the people at that say that 15dBm SNR or less
> > causes this, are they using 11Mbps only as their sensitivity?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
|