That is whith a KN-200!
> Interesting - I was just getting ready to purchase KN-200s to resolve
> that very same issue, I was using Orinoco AP2000s and having same
> problem. I will hold hold off pending a resultion to your problem - no
> sense spending the money for new equipment with same problem.
>
> I proved to Proxim that it wasn't a network congestion problem or a
> problem with the internet speed tests by:
> 1. Setting up an FTP server internal on my network.
> 2. Shutting off all customers - this wasn't much of an issue as I was
> testing network and only had people that were willing to use for free,
> under the understanding that it could go down at any time.
> 3. Repeatedly DLing & ULing a 120meg file from server to laptop & back,
> at vatious points in the network while watching with DU Meter.
>
> As for your Ping test - it would seem to me that if you are Rxing ~3.4
> mbps ROUND TRIP - since thisis half duplex the one way should be 2x
> that or 6.8mbps...?????
No idea, I was told that the ping fill results show a round trip results.
And that what ever I got in the ping fill will only show transfer half of
the results in one direction or the other. That I can prove wrong. What I
dont understand that if the ping fill is showing true duplex results as mine
seems to be then why am I getting less than half my 3MB/S feed at the
KN-200? The link is -47db signal and this is at the KN-200.
> Personnally - I don't give rat's @ss about any latency tests or any
> other built in tests - Those can be manipulated by the writer of the
> software to show favorable results. The only thing a customer, and
> therefore myself, cares about is that if they are being sold a service
> at particular speed, they get it. The only way to prove that is to have
> an internal network speed test of some sort.
>
> Here what they told me would support upto 1mbps thruput to customers at
> any point in the network (using TC for backhaul on one radio -the other
> radio to serve customers)
>
>
> Anyone using a network in similiar config, i.e. 4 wireless backhauls,
> that can verify this?
>
> Bryan
>
>
> jna wrote:
>
> >Hello Group,
> >
> >I am trying to diagnose bad transfer rates in my network and started at
> >square 1. We have an RG1000 SAT shooting a 3MB/S feed to a central relay
> >tower only about 1 mile from the datacenter (-47db Signal). The central
> >relay is running on kn-200 BASE. When I connect to the relay point via my
> >laptop I am lucky to see 800K to 1.2MB/S over the net transfers. Using
the
> >ping fill utility I measure that the transfer rates from the RG1000 SAT
to
> >the KN-200 is an average of 3.2 with a max of 3.6MB/S over the air.
> >According to the ping fill this should should be sufficent to cary my
3MB/S
> >feed but I am not seeing it at the central relay not even half of it.
> >
> >I asked Karlnet support about it and they said that is normal because the
> >ping fill shows round trip so my 3.2 to 3.6MB/S transfer to the relay
point
> >should on support 1.6 to 1.8MB/S one way (Even though there not even
seeing
> >that much). I questioned this and never received a reply back. On our
main
> >tower which is still on a T1 I have my home connection to the main tower
via
> >ping fill shows my average transfer time of 1,271,009 and max of
1,484,160.
> >Now if we took the half duplex analogy to mean this result is round trip
and
> >my connection according to ping fill and karlnet should only handle
630K -
> >742K either up or down, correct? But if this is true then why is it I can
> >register on the bandwidth testing sites using this same connection double
> >that actually about what the ping fill says? My average over the net
> >connection rating is 1.2MB/S ... Does anyone else have any information on
> >the actuall ping fill and if it even works right at all? If the above is
> >true then my 3.2-3.6MB/S link to the relay is accurate should get me my
> >3MB/S feed there with no problem.
> >
> >I cant get answers from karlnet support, does anyone have a clue here?
> >
> >Is anyone else using Karlnet for backhauling locations? Are you able to
> >backhaul more than a T1?
> >
> >Thank You,
> >John
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Karlnet mailing list
> >Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|