Ours is all bridge up and untill it hits the router.
John
> all bridged?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan" <blsutton@airnetwifi.net>
> To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates
>
>
> > It stripped the image...
> > See text based attempt below - you may have to widen your window to see
> > properly
> > Bryan wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting - I was just getting ready to purchase KN-200s to resolve
> > > that very same issue, I was using Orinoco AP2000s and having same
> > > problem. I will hold hold off pending a resultion to your problem -
> > > no sense spending the money for new equipment with same problem.
> > >
> > > I proved to Proxim that it wasn't a network congestion problem or a
> > > problem with the internet speed tests by:
> > > 1. Setting up an FTP server internal on my network.
> > > 2. Shutting off all customers - this wasn't much of an issue as I was
> > > testing network and only had people that were willing to use for free,
> > > under the understanding that it could go down at any time.
> > > 3. Repeatedly DLing & ULing a 120meg file from server to laptop &
> > > back, at vatious points in the network while watching with DU Meter.
> > >
> > > As for your Ping test - it would seem to me that if you are Rxing ~3.4
> > > mbps ROUND TRIP - since thisis half duplex the one way should be 2x
> > > that or 6.8mbps...?????
> > >
> > > Personnally - I don't give rat's @ss about any latency tests or any
> > > other built in tests - Those can be manipulated by the writer of the
> > > software to show favorable results. The only thing a customer, and
> > > therefore myself, cares about is that if they are being sold a service
> > > at particular speed, they get it. The only way to prove that is to
> > > have an internal network speed test of some sort.
> > >
> > > Here what they told me would support upto 1mbps thruput to customers
> > > at any point in the network (using TC for backhaul on one radio -the
> > > other radio to serve customers)
> > >
> > NOC<>KN200w/SG4400<=>KN200w/SG4400<=>KN200w/SG4400<=>KN200w/SG4200
> >
> > | |
> > KN200w/SG4400
> > KN200w/SG4400
> > |
> > |
> > KN200w/SG4400
> > Future
> > |
> > KN200w/SG4200
> > Upto 64 backhaul links off any one radio - I was told
> >
> > >
> > > Anyone using a network in similiar config, i.e. 4 wireless backhauls,
> > > that can verify this?
> > >
> > > Bryan
> > >
> > >
> > > jna wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello Group,
> > >>
> > >> I am trying to diagnose bad transfer rates in my network and started
at
> > >> square 1. We have an RG1000 SAT shooting a 3MB/S feed to a central
> relay
> > >> tower only about 1 mile from the datacenter (-47db Signal). The
central
> > >> relay is running on kn-200 BASE. When I connect to the relay point
> > >> via my
> > >> laptop I am lucky to see 800K to 1.2MB/S over the net transfers.
> > >> Using the
> > >> ping fill utility I measure that the transfer rates from the RG1000
> > >> SAT to
> > >> the KN-200 is an average of 3.2 with a max of 3.6MB/S over the air.
> > >> According to the ping fill this should should be sufficent to cary my
> > >> 3MB/S
> > >> feed but I am not seeing it at the central relay not even half of
it.
> > >>
> > >> I asked Karlnet support about it and they said that is normal because
> > >> the
> > >> ping fill shows round trip so my 3.2 to 3.6MB/S transfer to the relay
> > >> point
> > >> should on support 1.6 to 1.8MB/S one way (Even though there not even
> > >> seeing
> > >> that much). I questioned this and never received a reply back. On our
> > >> main
> > >> tower which is still on a T1 I have my home connection to the main
> > >> tower via
> > >> ping fill shows my average transfer time of 1,271,009 and max of
> > >> 1,484,160.
> > >> Now if we took the half duplex analogy to mean this result is round
> > >> trip and
> > >> my connection according to ping fill and karlnet should only handle
> > >> 630K -
> > >> 742K either up or down, correct? But if this is true then why is it I
> > >> can
> > >> register on the bandwidth testing sites using this same connection
> > >> double
> > >> that actually about what the ping fill says? My average over the net
> > >> connection rating is 1.2MB/S ... Does anyone else have any
> > >> information on
> > >> the actuall ping fill and if it even works right at all? If the above
> is
> > >> true then my 3.2-3.6MB/S link to the relay is accurate should get me
my
> > >> 3MB/S feed there with no problem.
> > >>
> > >> I cant get answers from karlnet support, does anyone have a clue
here?
> > >>
> > >> Is anyone else using Karlnet for backhauling locations? Are you able
to
> > >> backhaul more than a T1?
> > >>
> > >> Thank You,
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Karlnet mailing list
> > >> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > >> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|