RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question
From: Brian Spindor <ka7kuz.groups@comcast.net>
Reply-to: ka7kuz.groups@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:03:33 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Thank God I've got a delete key!....ENOUGH!
Brian
KA7KUZ

Tom Moore wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
>To: "'Tom Moore'" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>; "'RTTY'" <rtty@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question
>
>
>  
>
>>I'm not saying that SOxR isn't an advantage.  
>>    
>>
>
>Okay, we're making progress here.  You finally admit SOxR is an advantage.
>
>What I believe you're really saying then, is that to consider the SOxr or
>We've debunked the beam theory. We've debunked the skills theory.
>
>But in order to consider a separate category for either, we must still
>consider skill level (don't know how to measure that other than by
>final scores) and gain antennas (can't measure that either because its
>clear that what works in one place doesn't necessarily work in another -
>wire antennas can and have beat beam antennas). Lets leave all that
>to another debate and agree to disagree for the time being.
>
>73, Tom
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>