| To: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>,"'Tom Moore'" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>, "'Barry'" <w2up@mindspring.com>,"'RTTY List'" <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question |
| From: | Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:22:11 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
And we all know that is where the SO1R guys belong!! At 08:50 PM 7/24/2006, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: >If you want to put SOxR in a separate category you have to treat >gain antennas the same way. Otherwise you are saying to the SOxR >operator, "You are worth less than a 'normal' person. You belong >in the back of the bus." > >73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Be Careful What You Ask For ..., Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Bill Turner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Barry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |