RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>,"'RTTY'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question
From: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:20:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
To: "'Tom Moore'" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>; "'RTTY'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question


> 
> I'm not saying that SOxR isn't an advantage.  

Okay, we're making progress here.  You finally admit SOxR is an advantage.

What I believe you're really saying then, is that to consider the SOxr or
We've debunked the beam theory. We've debunked the skills theory.

But in order to consider a separate category for either, we must still
consider skill level (don't know how to measure that other than by
final scores) and gain antennas (can't measure that either because its
clear that what works in one place doesn't necessarily work in another -
wire antennas can and have beat beam antennas). Lets leave all that
to another debate and agree to disagree for the time being.

73, Tom

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>