seems to me, and I done this many times,,,, give the guy you want to
help a qso then work 2 or 3 of the big guns that you know will submit a
log--your buddy get the qso/credit,, the big guns verify you were
there--seems simple to me
73 john
Shelby Summerville wrote:
> John Barber GW4SKA wrote: "It would be ridiculous to automatically
> disqualify a perfectly
> good contact because that was the only occurrence of a call."
>
> I agree completely, and I would never question the integrity of the log
> checking process, or those doing the log checking! Several years ago, I sat
> at the same table during the RTTY contesting dinner, with P43P, and he had a
> great distaste for the log checking process, at that time, because he had,
> just as W7LD, several legitimate contacts removed from his log, just because
> they were unique. He was so upset that he vowed to never again enter that
> particular contest.
>
> This is a first for me, and I'm terrible disappointed with it!
>
> I have a QSO with you at the last weekend in the EARTTY Contest.
> I have a problem with my computer.
> Please confirm the dates qso.
> 04-04-09 19:29 14Mhz Nº 136 ---- It is OK?
>
> The call sign of the sending station is intentionally omitted, and the
> information requested is correct. I just have a problem with this type of
> request?
>
> On the brighter side of things...stay tuned for the Dayton RTTY contesting
> forum announcement, should be forthcoming, this week.
>
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|