RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013
From: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 00:34:50 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Joe,

You wrote:
No it's not ... tell me where a G has to change callsigns when moving
within England, or an F has to change callsigns when moving within
France, or a DL has to change callsigns when moving within Germany.

You know that a G station DOES change calls within different areas of the UK.
G, F and DL are also just a little bit smaller than the United States.

*Otherwise* keep your nose out of US
regulatory matters and stop penalizing US stations.
Time for BARTG to stop trying to dictate licensing policy to the US
- *period*.

There are no penalties and nobody 'half a world away' trying to change anything there. It's entirely your choice whether you enter a contest and follow the rules.

Jay WS7I is almost right when he says:
BARTG pre-dates nearly every other contest and has been running a long long time and they don't need to use another contest's rules nor to modify it for stations who don't wish to abide by their rules.

Thanks Jay. Actually BARTG predates every other RTTY contest! Next longest running is Volta which first ran 2 months after the first BARTG HF.

Cheers,

John






----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013



Likewise, although the FCC is a federal authority, it makes sense
that when you move from one call district to another that you get a
call sign that corresponds to the call district you now reside in.

10 call districts for the US is completely arbitrary ... initially
there were only 9!  Some countries don't even use all the digits
in their callsigns.

This is the way it works with call signs everywhere else and its the
way a lot of people would like to see it again according to the
reaction I got from my original post on the subject.

No it's not ... tell me where a G has to change callsigns when moving
within England, or an F has to change callsigns when moving within
France, or a DL has to change callsigns when moving within Germany.

Likewise, although the FCC is a federal authority, it makes sense
that when you move from one call district to another that you get a
call sign that corresponds to the call district you now reside in.

It's the United States' FCC that made the decision.  If you want to
go back to call districts meaning something - also go back to the
days when we could have multiple callsigns so we can get appropriate
calls for each call area.  *Otherwise* keep your nose out of US
regulatory matters and stop penalizing US stations.

I played the game of using /4 when I first moved to Florida.  I
decided I was not likely to move back to "8 land" and got a call
with the "proper" numeral but I would not do it again if I ever
happen to leave 4-land.

It is, after all, the decision of the US regulatory authority - not
some amateurs half a world away.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 1/7/2013 11:14 PM, Ken Alexander wrote:
Geez Bill, where are you getting this from?  I was pretty careful to
keep my discussion about moving from one call district to another.
Nobody suggested 50 call districts or thousands based on counties, and
any discussion of speed limits is irrelevant here.  You've taken this to
a ridiculous conclusion that only damages your credibility.

My comparison to drivers licenses when moving from state to state was
merely to point out that you had to get a new state-issued drivers
license if you took up residency in a new state.  Likewise, although the
FCC is a federal authority, it makes sense that when you move from one
call district to another that you get a call sign that corresponds to
the call district you now reside in.  This is the way it works with call
signs everywhere else and its the way a lot of people would like to see
it again according to the reaction I got from my original post on the
subject.

Ultimately, nothing is likely to change.  As you say, one call will be
issued that's good for anywhere in the U.S..  It's just a shame to see
an orderly system (one that works so well everywhere else in the world)
trashed in the name of bureaucratic laziness and personal vanity.

73,

Ken Alexander
VE3HLS


On 2013-01-07 9:31 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:46:57 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
<snip>
You report any moves to another call district, just like you do with
your drivers license when you move to a new state, right?
REPLY:
Apples and oranges.

In the USA, different states have different rules of the road. In wide
open
Montana speed limits may be quite different from a more congested
eastern state.
Having a driver's license and different rules for each state makes sense.

Not so for the FCC. The rules are nationwide and do not vary from one
part of
the country to another.

So let's take you point. I live in California and have a W6 call
(W6WRT, my
initials). Suppose I move to the 5th call area and I become W5WRT. Now
what
state am I in? Would you like the FCC to issue calls based on the
state? There
could be W01AAA through W50ZZZ  I suppose. California was the 31st
state so I
could be W31WRT.  Would that be better? There are some 3000+ counties
in the
USA. Why not have W2754XXX? Is that better? How about cities? Towns?
Villages?
Wide spots in the road?

As it is now, the FCC issues one call that is valid anywhere in it's
jurisdiction. Good enough I say.

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/6005 - Release Date: 01/02/13


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>