RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:08:10 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
By the way, let me float this to the RTTY community -- do you prefer that we 
submit individual comments to the FCC, or do you prefer that we together draft 
out something for interested parties to sign (and tout their own credentials, 
if need be).
 
I know that there is already at least one effort to collect as much 
documentation as possible to counter ARRL's lame idea.  I have been in the CC 
of emails of such activity, and have also participated in the private 
discussions.

If a collective, well thought out comment is publish before any FCC deadline, 
would you prefer to sign that instead of submitting your own?

I have not floated this idea to anyone yet, I am interested in what the 
community prefers, and we'll see if the folks who are already drafting a 
comment (let's call them "the usual suspects" of RTTY HI HI) would be willing 
to let others add their names.

BTW, the signatures do not have to be limited US licensed hams, since QRM can 
travel far and wide and affect everybody, including SWL.

73
Chen, W7AY








_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>