RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

To: Ian White <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 06:54:01 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ian is correct. Technology is a wonderful thing and is a good
supplement. But, it is no substitute for common courtesy.

From another point of view, many listeners might be observing
a waterfall, all at the same time from various locations.
Some might see a 'point' as occupied while others do not. Since
there are no fixed frequencies, adjacent operating points vary.
In addition, the 'laws' of one-way-propagation can apply.

QRL or no QRL. Waterfall or no waterfall, contests have become
for me, a matter of overblown egos and budgets. That's why I
seldom participate and if I do make an exchange I don't submit
a log. I really don't care about making points.

73 de Phil - N8PS








Quoting Ian White <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>:

If you do have a waterfall display and you do check it carefully before
calling CQ, the only person who knows that is *yourself*. To anyone else
who might be listening, you are indistinguishable from that other kind
of operator who just appears on a frequency without checking at all.

So even though I do have a waterfall and I do check it carefully, I will
never skip sending "QRL?"

73 from Ian GM3SEK


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>