RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum

To: "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Waterfall and CQ conundrum
From: Jeff Rinehart via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Jeff Rinehart <jmrinehart@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ok - so don't use QRZ - got that - Test is too long -  got that too.  So, if we 
don't use CQ and Test is too long, what is the alternative other than just 
waiting for the Skimmer folks to figure it out?
I don't use Skimmer myself but I can appreciate it's value.  Whether or not a 
person uses Skimmer isn't the issue if I understand it right.  It's this thing 
of Skimmer picking up CQ just in front of a S&P'ers callsign and then posting 
that on the cluster as someone's Run frequency when actually that callsign 
should only be associated with the S&P'er.  Am I still confused?  or just 
Dense!  I Do want to operate correctly even though I am just a Little Pistol 
providing contacts for the Big Boys!  I am posting this because there are, no 
doubt, lots of others out there reading this who are just too shy to say 
anything.  de W4PJW
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>