TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 75 Ohm twin velocity factor ?

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 75 Ohm twin velocity factor ?
From: "dw" <bw_dw@fastmail.fm>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:16:27 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Great Stuff!!!
What is the width of it Steve?


On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:58:02 -0000, "Steve Hunt" <steve@karinya.net>
said:
> Duane,
> 
> 75 ohm twin is still available here in the UK from at least one supplier.
> He has:
> 
>       "75 OHM TWIN.medium size..will take 400 watt PEP.  
>       HEAVY DUTY 75 OHM TWIN.made specially for us this is very robust
>       and will take many kilowatts.stranded copper conductors"
> 
> 
>       Cheers,
>       Steve G3TXQ 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: dw 
>   To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment 
>   Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 8:43 AM
>   Subject: Re: [TenTec] 75 Ohm twin velocity factor ?
> 
> 
>   Can you buy 75 ohm ladder now?
>   Tnx,
>   Duane
> 
> 
>   On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:06:52 -0600, "donhall161"
>   <donhall161@sbcglobal.net> said:
>   > Steve,
>   > 
>   > The 1985 ARRL Handbook chapter on Transmission Lines lists 75 ohm
>   > twinlead 
>   > with a Vf = 0.67.
>   > 
>   > 73  Don  K5AQ 
>   > 
>   > _______________________________________________
>   > TenTec mailing list
>   > TenTec@contesting.com
>   > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>   -- 
>     dw
>     dw@sover.net
> 
>   _______________________________________________
>   TenTec mailing list
>   TenTec@contesting.com
>   http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
-- 
  dw
  dw@sover.net

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>