TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability
From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Reply-to: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:55:00 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Wayne: My experience is very much like yours. I listened for quite a while last night in a CW pile-up on 40 using different combinations of RF gain, AF gain, pre-amp, attenuation and NR. About the only special situation I found was when a single signal is very weak and in the noise, dropping the RF gain until the noise drops a few dB makes the signal easier to copy.
       Ron N6IE
     www.N6IE.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability


This has been an interesting discussion alright.

I have spent quite a bit of time experimenting with different settings
of af gain/rf gain/agc using an Orion II with latest firmware.
My observations have been that the difference in readability of a weak
cw dx station has for me been minimal by increasing af gain and riding
the rf gain regardless of agc settings.
It does not seem to alter the s/n ratio between the weak cw station and
the atmospheric noise much at all, if any.

Perhaps this is because I am using a vertical antenna that may be more
noise susceptible?
The difficulty I have with minimal agc and high af/low rf gain is that
as soon as the dx station signs, a very strong station calls and just
about blasts me across the room before I can get the rf gain down.

Advice please?
Tnx & 73,
Wayne

--
 Wayne Whitman
 Cell:270-282-3550
 wwhitman@fastmail.fm

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>