I don't think the concept was to pay for fixes, but to pay for new firmware
functions. However, after some period of time, it might be reasonable to
charge for ongoing "support" much like many software companies do. This
presumes a certain level of quality from the outset.
73, Duane
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
www.ac5aa.com
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Kc9cdt@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:58 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
Tom,
Why in the world would you want to pay for firmware updates to fix a product
that you have and still is not right? I am not talking about optional
features
here.
Just curious where you are comming from?
Am I missing something here?
Lee
**************
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used
car listings at AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|