There are some folks who are into "hi-fi" SSB at wider than useful bandwidths,
with expensive gold plated microphones and audio processing gear, trying to
make their 6 kHz wide signals sound like hi-fi FM broadcasts. Hence the
obsession with LF and HF rolloff. I think this is a useless exercise, I don't
see the point in it. The FCC used to impose bandwidth restrictions on amateur
operation I thought, but apparently these were relaxed recently (?). Let us
hope that they again impose bandwidth restrictions.
---- kc9cdt@aol.com wrote:
> I have my low freq. rolloff at 100...why would I want to have any audio below
> that?
> I use TX BW of 2850..why would I waist band space using anythin wider?
> Everyone that knows my voicesays with thosw settings I sound very good and
> like in person.
>
> If that is the only major complaint of Flex...seems mute to me. Not that I
> want one anyways...I'll stick wih OII.
>
> 73,
> Lee
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
> To: sv8ing@yahoo.gr; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Cc: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 7:01 am
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Firmware
>
>
>
> Fotis SV8ING wrote:
>
> > Let's see Flex.
> ...
> > The radio cannot handle low frequencies below 100HZ no matter
> > what you do (in SSB mode).
>
>
> Dear OM,
>
> do you have any measurement results?
>
> 73,
>
> Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|