Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?

To: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:47:17 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
To: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?

Wouldn't that have corresponded to the FCC's reduction in "clear-channel"
strategies, and more local market driven commercial agendas?  When I was a
kid in the early 50's I got a QSL card from WOAI and WHO for sending them a
postcard telling them I was hearing them in Columbus, Ohio.  And the whole
point of the 1937 Brown, Lewis and Epstein study was that you DIDN"T need
tall towers for daytime coverage.

The point of B, L, and E was ground systems as a factor in antenna effiency. They covered antennas up to 1/4 wave tall.

The death of 5/8th wave radiators related to increased fading at outer areas of coverage. As mentioned, station had disappointing results. They also discovered problems with severely tapered radiators, like wide base self supporting towers.


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>