To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: FT8 qrm |
From: | cqtestk4xs--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | cqtestk4xs@aol.com |
Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:32:11 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Although this might not be a gigantic issue on 160 it is a big issue on 20. During peak time in CQWW I was copying CW contest signals up to around 14125. Parking spots are hard to come by on 20 and 40. Nobody owns a freq, except the "pig farmers" on 75. 73 Bill KH7XS/K4XS -----Original Message----- From: Greg <n4cc@windstream.net> To: 'topband' <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Wed, Nov 29, 2017 7:26 pm Subject: Re: Topband: FT8 qrm Jeez -- enough already...how difficult is it to avoid 2.5 khz of bandwidth that is not even in the DX portion of the band! Leave FT8 alone and fight the QRM below 1835. 73, Greg-N4CC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: FT8 discussion, Mike Waters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: FT8 and digital QRM, Ralph Parker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: FT8 qrm, Gary Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: FT8 qrm, Don Field |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |