To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea |
From: | ag0n@arrl.net (ag0n@arrl.net) |
Date: | Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:54:51 -0700 |
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:27:37 -0500, Bill Otten wrote: > The tilt over base of my tower puts the hinge at about 9 feet. By the way, all of my statements about crankups have been regarding TILT over, NOT FOLD OVER. I have only one experience with a fold over tower and it spooked me! Not saying it can't be done right, but this one wasn't. In my vocabulary, tilt over means it hinges at the bottom, not part way up. That's folding - like your elbow does. gm -- There is no x in my ISPs domain name. |
Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Bob Thacker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, n4kg@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, <res0958z@verizon.net (Bill Otten) |
Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, <res0958z@verizon.net (Bill Otten) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |