Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover
From: "Don W7WLL" <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:04:31 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Rather than all the experts posting their knowledge amongst themselves here, why not instead send these comments to the ARRL Publications Manager in the form of less vitrolic 'constructive criticism', perhaps suggesting a reminder article on the subject is due in QST?

Don W7WLL

-----Original Message----- From: ve4xt@mymts.net
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:55 AM
To: Patrick Greenlee
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover

Interesting that on this reflector, and in the shoddy "journalism" by the quoted magazine, nobody has attempted to contact the ARRL or get the other side of the story.

Then again, balanced reporting is just fake news anyway. Only reporting that services the correct agenda is any good.

Mistake? Yes. Evidence the school teaches unsafe procedures? Hardly. It is more likely a staged photo inches from safety with the tie-off just slapped together. Showing such is wrong and a correction is in order.

73, kelly, ve4xt

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 27, 2017, at 7:40 AM, Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net> wrote:

A correction needs to be published to point out unsafe issues illustrated by the cover shot. There are, however, no facts in evidence that the girl was in danger. This was quite likely a posed shot with her feet within inches of or on the ground, something for the photographer's convenience.

Patrick        NJ5G



On 2/27/2017 6:56 AM, knowkode@verizon.net wrote:

 Rob,

Agreed. However, rather than league bashing on this forum, I would encourage every league member to contact their section mgr, division director, and everyone they can think of in Newington. They have done a great disservice to the safety of their members by promoting something like this.

Safety first,
Jim, W5QM


-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Feb 27, 2017 5:51 am
Subject: [TowerTalk] March QST cover

Has anyone else here seen the totally idiotic QST cover for the March issue?

If not take a look:

http://wirelessestimator.com/articles/2017/cover-girl-climber-shot-could-send-high-schoolers-to-their-death/

It is ridiculous in so many ways.  If I were ARRL executive director
I'd call in the editors and tell them to start cleaning out their
desks.   Another example of how QST is run now by completely
non-technical people.

73

Rob
K5UJ
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>