VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives
From: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:35:03 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:22:27AM -0400, Bill Katt wrote:

> Sure, but it doesn't change my questions...  I honestly don't see what
> the problem is with borrowing equipment, or lending, or helping, or
> using underused bands, or any of the other staples of the arguments
> defining persons as 'captive rovers'.  And it doesn't change the
> imagery I see when I hear the term either...

Which do you think is more healthy for the contest:

1. Equiping a rover that ends up only working W2SZ.

2. Equiping a rover that works W2SZ and a bunch of other stations?

Tree
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>