VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] "Captive Rover" talking point, debunked

To: "VHF Contesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] "Captive Rover" talking point, debunked
From: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:49:35 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
As is often the case the devil is in the details and, just like everybody 
else, you did not provide a workable definition of what goes in the new 
category. It's important to know that so that people can start working on 
new strategies to maximize their score while staying within the existing 
category (you do know they are going to do that right?)

Jim, AF6O

> All we need to do is create an additional category to
> separate the traditional rover from the captive / circling / pack
> rovers.  It is my opinion that separating the two methods of operation
> would only spawn additional activity.  Now granted there will need to
> be some rules clarification as to which category your log submission
> should go in but that's about it.


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>