VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives

from [Jim Forsyth] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives
From: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:59:32 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> 
>> Which do you think is more healthy for the contest:
>> 
>> 1. Equiping a rover that ends up only working W2SZ.
>> 
>> 2. Equiping a rover that works W2SZ and a bunch of other stations?
> 
> # 2

Here's another one:

Which do you think is more healthy for the contest:

1. Equiping a rover that ends up only working W2SZ.

2. Not equiping a rover at all.

Jim, AF6O


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives, George Fremin III
Next by Date:  Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives, George Fremin III
Previous by Thread:  Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives, George Fremin III
Next by Thread:  Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives, Kenneth E. Harker
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]