VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the two simple rules" [was: Explaining "

To: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Explaining "the two simple rules" [was: Explaining "the three simple rules"]
From: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:21:14 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 21:01, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's so much work for me to move once I've set up 10 bands on a hill that I
> don't want to take it down and reset up somewhere else. It takes over two
> hours for me to set up and again to tear down. I'd rather sit on one hill
> for the contest length than lose all that extra time setting up on another
> site.

Mike wrote

While so very true I'm thinking in terms of a smaller rove like only
50/144/222/432 plus maybe 1.2 that does not require near as much
effort to make a move.

-- 
Mike Urich, KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com

If pro is opposite of con.
Then what is the opposite of progress?
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>