VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Roving in one grid ?

To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Roving in one grid ?
From: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 08:53:13 -0600
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Mike - I'll make a prediction.

Change the Rover class to allow a Rover to enter by visiting one grid
and one of these days, the Law of Unintended Consequences will kick
in.  A guy will coax jumper from his vehicle over to his massive
VHF/UHF antenna farm in his back yard, run the whole contest that way,
turn in a 300K score as a classic Rover, kick everyone's butt or break
a long-standing record, totally piss off the Rover community and cause
the rules to be re-written again.

THAT is why I suggested just amending the definition of Single Op to
include mobiles, which would not impact ANY existing class in any way.

Jay W9RM

Keith J Morehouse
Managing Partner
Calmesa Partners G.P.
Olathe, CO


On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:57 PM, R. Michael West <k6nc@saciplaw.com> wrote:
>  If this change were made to Section 2.5: "....who move in or among one or 
> more grid squares.......", I believe this issue would be resolved.
>
> That's for those who think it may be necessary. Personally, I don't.
>
> It is ridiculous to create a new category for mobile operators who operate 
> during a contest in only one grid, IMHO.
>
> After all, it's a contest, not a drive out to WalMart with the rig to make a 
> few contacts on the way.
>
> Next will be a call for new categories for bicycle mobiles, walking mobiles, 
> canoe mobile, and the rest.
>
> 73, Mike K6NC
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>