--part1_48.25997c7.293441c2_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 11/26/01 7:30:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
clive@gw3njw.fsworld.co.uk writes:
> Is there any way that the save operation can be speeded up,
> perhaps by caching in some way?
>
I run WL on a 233 mhz Sony Vaio laptop with 129 meg of memory. I never have
a speed problem with any functions, such as file saving, sending CW,
DXTelnet, etc. My hunch is that your config with only 32 megs of memory is
your problem. I'd suggest upping your memory to its max, and running WL with
a minimum of other programs running simultaneously.
73, Geo...
George I. Wagner, K5KG
941-312-9450
914-312-9460 fax
--part1_48.25997c7.293441c2_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 11/26/01
7:30:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, clive@gw3njw.fsworld.co.uk writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT:
5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Is there any way that the save
operation can be speeded up,
<BR>perhaps by caching in some way?
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>I run WL on a 233 mhz Sony Vaio laptop with 129 meg of memory. I
never have a speed problem with any functions, such as file saving, sending CW,
DXTelnet, etc. My hunch is that your config with only 32 megs of memory
is your problem. I'd suggest upping your memory to its max, and running
WL with a minimum of other programs running simultaneously.
<BR>
<BR>73, Geo...
<BR>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000ff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial"
LANG="0"><B><I>George I. Wagner, K5KG
<BR>941-312-9450
<BR>914-312-9460 fax</B></I></FONT></HTML>
--part1_48.25997c7.293441c2_boundary--
|