CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, yccc@yccc.org
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite
From: hankkier@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:28:39 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Didn't expect my thread to generate so much interest! Incidentally, keep 
forgetting that my email doesn't include my call, so wasn't identified as the 
author - I'm KF2O, Hank Kiernan.

Just to throw something out as a POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT (?):

what if W/VEs were only allowed to call CQ or solicit contacts some other way, 
or do anything else to hold a frequency (=run) on the odd numbered hours, and 
DX only on the even numbered hours?

My thought here is that this might reduce the problem for the non 
super-stations on both sides of finding a run frequency without stepping on 
toes. I THINK (?) it might also make it much more possible for the weaker 
stations (on both sides) to successfully S&P by reducing QRM level somewhat. 
all of which makes for less "boring", to me at least. probably makes the 
strategy aspects a little more interesting for the competitive stations - what 
to do during the S&Ping hours.

S&Ping would be OK full-time of course. and might not make the rule effective 
on 160 meter band, since QRM and running is not nearly the problem there...plus 
propagation to a given area is often short-lived and might be missed if 
restricted from CQing.

I'm sure there are minuses to this, which we'll hear about!

Hank  KF2O


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>