CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting and the FT8 Revolution

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting and the FT8 Revolution
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 11:58:37 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 6/20/2021 9:46 AM, AB1J via CQ-Contest wrote:
The ARRL hasn't done anything.  Technological change has.
The DX clusters and RBN destroyed the value of DXCC.

One of the technological changes that many of us OTs has ignored while we brag about our achievements is the explosion of RF noise over the last 10-15 years. When I moved to W6 in 2006, it was possible to work EU on CW (although openings were few and far between), and I made several dozen QSOs over about 4 years. But the ubiquity of switch-mode power supplies and other noise sources on both ends of the path have made CW obsolete for THIS path. In the last six seasons, I've actually heard six of the EU CW spots I've seen, and only two have heard me, and with a better antenna farm than I had then.

And those living on the east coast and in EU talking about their high country counts need to admit to their advantage with DXCC. Working countries in or close to EU is comparable to working US states and VE provinces in the US. From my QTH near San Francisco, my relatively easy DX to populous countries (compared to EU from the east coast) yields JA, UA0, China, VK, KH6, KL7, and ZL. Using the analogy of American baseball, operating from EU or the east coast of NA and bragging about country counts is like running home from third base and thinking you hit a home run.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>