TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
From: "John" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:49:58 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Rick...et al....

I took Scott's message this morning as a positive sign.  Improving existing 
gear before producing new gear.  Fingers crossed here.  I did, in fact, sell 
my K3.  I like my Orion.

73 John K4NP
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick Williams" <ve7asr@yahoo.com>
To: "Ten-Tec Reflector" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey


> Fair question Bernie.  Yes I am using an Orion (565).
> I have the luxury to be able to operate BOTH Version 2
> and Version 1 firmware.
>
> Version 2 has the benefit of a sharper display and a
> functioning sweep (without lockup).
>
> On the other had Version 1 has (in my opinion) a
> superior set of noise reduction algorithms and a notch
> system that operates in a different portion of the
> AGC.  (In Version 2 if you are listening to an S-2
> signal and an S-9 carrier is dropped on it the notch
> removes the carrier.  The meter still shows S-9 and
> the AGC can pump accordingly.  In Version 1 the
> S-meter drops to S-2 and the AGC behaves.  The notch
> and auto-notch in most 'high-end' rigs behave like
> Version 1.)
>
> These 2 functions, again in my opinion, make the
> version 1 firmware a better choice for my operating
> style.
>
> It is my understanding that when using Version 2
> firmware the Orion 565 and 566 are very similar.
>
> 73,
> Rick
> VE7TK
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
> From:
>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:49:55 EDT
>
>
> Rick,
>
> Please believe that I am truly not trying to be
> argumentative here.
>
> But I truly wonder what you mean.  What "full
> potential" is the  Orion II not
> reaching?  Are there some specific performance
> parameters that  you know
> could somehow be better improved with firmware
> changes?
>
> I operate about half CW and half SSB (with a
> smattering of digital modes
> thrown in).  And aside from a too-generous s-meter, I
> don't know what I  need
> to
> help my Orion II somehow achieve more of its
> "potential."
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> (And now that I've written all this, I realize you may
> be talking about the
> Orion (as opposed to the Orion II that I have...).  If
> so, my apologies,
> because I know nothing about how an Orion performs.)
>
> Thanks and 73,
> Bernie K5XS
>
>
>
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> -- 
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.11.6/938 - Release Date: 8/5/2007 
> 4:16 PM
>
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>