TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey

To: "Rick Denney" <rick@rickdenney.com>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
From: "Perry W. Remaklus" <Perry@willbell.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:44:42 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Greetings,

I agree. Get it thought our before you begin to write code. Most of the
time and work will be in the thinking stage.

Perry W1COW


What I would like to see is an open process for writing a detailed
description of all the various ways a radio might be used as the basis
for a concept of operation ("operation" in terms of the user, not the
system), and then a set of explicitly traceable functional
requirements for software. This is where openly involving volunteers
is most helpful and positive. Then, if one of those desired activities
cannot be accommodated in the design, at least we know it's a real
limitation and not an accident. It would also help Ten Tec avoid
spending too much accommodating activities around which the user
community has no concensus.

Rick, KR9D

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>