Steve,
I doubt if TenTec had very many proof readers in 1986. Usually the
design engineer has to sign off on the drawn schematic and should have
caught a lot of these errors. All I think we can do is, to continue to
document the errors and hopefully get to the point where we have some
confidence in the schematic. I'm not there yet.
Jerry W5JH
"building something without experimenting is just solder practice"
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Hunt
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 4:41 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II
One of the problems is that TT are not consistent in the way they label
components. For example, on the 80987 board schematic all the RF blocking
chokes are labelled 100mH; on all the other schematics I've looked at they
are labelled 100uH.
Also, I've just been experimenting with the CorsairII sidetone circuit and
noticed that the Pitch and Level controls, labelled R93 and R97 on the
schematic, are silk-screened as R2 and R3 on the board. At this rate it
might be easier to produce a list of which components are correct :)
Steve G3TXQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|