To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877 |
From: | w6ru@bak.rr.com (Terry Gaiser) |
Date: | Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:39:55 -0800 |
Tim, They are claiming 10 KW "PEP" ... NOT peak. Terry W6RU ----- Original Message ----- From: <TimNebo@aol.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:10 AM Subject: Re: [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877 > In a message dated 11/7/02 10:02:12 AM Central Standard Time, 2@vc.net writes: > > > ** PEP is the finite RMS power at the max peak output. Thus 1kW PEP = > > 2kW peak. > > > well if your correct you settle it since that would mean 5kw pep which is > very realistic for a pair of 8877's would mean 10kw peak as they claimed. > > Tim > www.KpDxGroup.net > > _______________________________________________ > Amps mailing list > Amps@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Steve Thompson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, wb8jkr@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, TimNebo@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, wb8jkr@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |