Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 4CX10 000J

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX10 000J
From: zdtech <zdtech@iprimus.com.au>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:30:43 +1000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Whats interesting is that if you look at the Eimac published data on the 
4CX10000D running  at  1350 volts on the screen, the 3rd order IMD 
figure is close or equal to the 4CX10000J's.  This data comes from Care 
and Feeding, the old edition.  Considering that you need a higher 
filament current  transformer  i would say its advantages are    small 
compared to the readily available D version. However if you picked them 
up at a cheap price one would never say no! The 4CX600J or 4cx350FJ 
would make a super driver for this J rated bottle. However it would be 
a  insult to drive any of these tubes with the any of the current  model 
ham model transceivers. The Rockwell HF 8010A would be a superb low IMD 
driver match for these excellent tubes..

Craig
VK3HE

Peter Voelpel wrote:
> All the J-types are low distortion, gain of both is about 20db
>
> 73
> Peter, DF3KV
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
> What are the differences between the 4CX1000J and 4CX10000D - 
> particularly to explain the 10 KW vs. 15 KW output difference 
> in the "normal operation" figures on the Eimac short form 
> catalog (www.cpii.com/eimac)?  Of course, with a listed gain 
> of 4.5, it would seem to take 2500 W or so to drive either of 
> them to their full capability ... 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>