Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ...

To: "Tony King - W4ZT" <amps071806@w4zt.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ...
From: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:18:28 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Thanks Tony:

HMMMM, that even makes it more difficult because I don't have the foggiest 
idea where to go to establish preferences.  If I went there is it possible 
to make those choices.  I will go look at contesting dot com and see what I 
find.  Stand by for news.

Mike, W5UC
http://members.cox.net/w5uc

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony King - W4ZT" <amps071806@w4zt.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ...


Mike,

This is not a Yahoo mail group.  It is hosted by Contesting dot Com.

73, Tony W4ZT


Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH) wrote:
> Steve, I just went to the Yahoo Preferences page and found no such 
> setting.
> I believe that is a function of the way the reflector sends the messages
> out.  This is not likely to change as it is probably engrained in the 
> entire
> Yahoo Culture.  Unless the moderator has the power to change this, I doubt
> that anything will happen.
>
> 73,
> Mike, W5UC
> http://members.cox.net/w5uc
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Spam from Members of this List ...
>
>
>
>
> GGLL wrote:
>> Ian White GM3SEK escribió:
>>
>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>> A large chunk of this problem is the creeping habit of sending an
>>> individual 'courtesy' copy of a reply that is also being posted to the
>>> list. Many kinds of e-mail software do this by default (unfortunately,
>>> some would say) and they pick up the originator's address from the
>>> message header.
>>>
>>> Many people (myself included) do not feel the need for that extra copy
>>> at all. We're going to read your message on the list anyhow, and having
>>> two copies in the system only invites confusion. You could say it is
>>> more courteous *not* to send an extra copy.
>>>
>>
>> I agree, one has to send only one copy. And also disagree with the "open
>> full" access to the forum's messages including addresses, by anyone who 
>> do
>> a
>> simple search as Tony said.
>> I don't know why, but in this regard I'm lucky. Although I see the amps
>> reflector address among mine's in the recipients list, I always receive
>> one
>> message, not two.
> I'm sure there's a setting in the preferences when you register that
> removes the multiple copies if someone sends to the list and to the
> individual.
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>