>>> Seems like the last two big Dxpeditions (CY9 and 3D2) are putting FT8 first
>>> before the traditional CW/SSB modes. I sure hope this isn't the future of
>>> ham radio.
I might not be politically correct, but why not to mention that one of the all
of the DXpeditions' goals is to try to maximize the overall QSO count in order
to get more donation? That's what hiding behind "best kept secret" (that
everybody knows) of F/H mode in FT8 in my opinion.
I'm not saying it's bad or good, but it's a fact.
Multi-channel streams need to be prohibited, otherwise it looks like hypocrisy.
I still remember how the rules for M/S in the ARRL Contests were changed under
the pressure after PJ4G(?) team managed to have 2 stations on the same band
(even not at the same time).
Yuri VE3DZ
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Clarke
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 10:51 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification
Didn't someone create a FT8 contest reflector? It would be nice to take all
these comments over there. Seems like FT8 is monopolizing the contest reflector
just like it is on the air.
Seems like the last two big Dxpeditions (CY9 and 3D2) are putting FT8 first
before the traditional CW/SSB modes. I sure hope this isn't the future of ham
radio.
BTW I do operate some FT8 because I'm working on a the digital DXCC.
(because there is hardly any RTTY activity outside of contests) Now that I've
reached 100 countries I'm starting to get bored with it.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|