TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code
From: Martin AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:25:59 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Joel,

The first requirement for working at League HQ must be having a really thick skin! You can't win no matter what you do or don't do -- at least for some vocal folks.

Let's all take a deep breath and enjoy the holiday spirit. Peace to those of good will.

Enjoy your favorite modes, and consider learning a new one.

73 Martin AA6E

joel hallas wrote:
Well folks, I've been biting my tounge (fingers?) for days but can't stand it any more! I must remark in support of Carter's comment. In terms of the folks who run the ARRL, I can say that they are definately not anti-CW. In fact:

CEO, K1ZZ, is a very hot CW contester, DXer and DXpedition op who understands and uses CW extensively and with great proficiency. It's the only mode I've heard him on. COO, WJ1B, works most modes, but I've only worked him on CW and he certainly is a fine op.
Mgr of F&ES, N1NN, is an ex Navy radio op, and one of the best on CW
Mgr of MSD, N7NG, is a DXpedition op and CW contestor of long standing.
Sr. News Reporter, N1RL, regularly operates CW at 40 wpm from his car, as well as from home. Even the lowly QST Technical Editor is 90% a CW op and is usually on 40 CW on his way to Hq!

Of course there are others, both phone and CW ops, and I'm sure I've left off some great CW op members of the Hq team, but I certainly take issue with the statement that ARRL Hq leadership is "anti-CW." I know that they were not happy at the FCC action. Nor were they happy about much of the fone band increase.

73, Joel

Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
Technical Editor, QST
ARRL


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>