TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4

from [Paul Christensen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 08:37:50 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
> Sorry Barry, latency measured on the Anan does not necessarily apply to
the FLEX 6000. 

I made timing and latency measurements of my Flex 6700 using an Agilent
4-channel DSO.  I captured the data and uploaded the DSO graphic images.
Keep an eye on the PTT trace from the external keyer as the timing
reference.    QSK performance has improved further since the date of these
measurements.  QSK performance is at least as good as the K3 and the many
Ten Tecs I've owned.   It is fast.  At 40+ wpm, I don't feel like I'm
dragging characters behind me due to any latency, and there are no headphone
audio thumps or clicks in CW T/R transitions.  

https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/flex_6700_cw_keying_v_elecr
aft_k3

Paul, W9AC  

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, Barry N1EU
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, Barry N1EU
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, rick@dj0ip.de
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4, Barry N1EU
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]