Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?

To: "Roger \(K8RI\)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:45:39 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Nope, its no wonder considering their attitude problem on the telephone.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?


On 10/20/2013 8:54 PM, Carl wrote:
All 3 of the Command Tech amps 1/2/3 tubes used a single toroid switched
for 40, 80, and 160 followed by the balun. It was the switched pi net
toroid that caused problems.
On the 6M amp they also use a balun.

When Palstar bought the line they went to 3 seperate toroids and kept
the balun.


Is Palstar still building amps?

73

Roger (K8RI)

Ive worked on several of all models from both companies and havent had a
balun problem but none were used for RTTY that Im aware of.

Carl
KM1H


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3222/6267 - Release Date: 10/20/13

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>