Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?

To: audioguy@q.com, Amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?
From: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
THE COMMAND TECH HF-2500E THAT RUNS 3 3CX800 TUBES USES THIS UN-UN SYSTEM AND 
AT 3KW OUTPUT THERE SEEMS TO BE NO ISSUES WHATSOEVER.   Seems to be a tried and 
true design.  It's hard to argue with success like that.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Barber <audioguy@q.com>
To: Amps <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 20, 2013 3:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Amps] 200-ohm tank and "un-un" in HF amp design?


Thanks for the replies.

Notables are:
(1) Higher loading cap voltage (Gold Star Winner)
(2) Loss, and what to do with the heat
(3) Cost


Thanks and 73,
Jim N7CXI

---------
Assuming adequate core/wire sizing and airflow, can anyone think of a 
solid reason *not* to design a legal-limit HF amp output tank for 200 
ohms, then use a 4:1 "un-un" transformer to step it down to 50?

I'm curious because doing so would bring the loading cap requirement for 
a 4000-ohm plate impedance down to under 1000pF at 1.8 mHz, which can be 
done with a large air variable alone.

Note: Yes, I know it *has* been done already, but I'm asking for 
opinions as to whether you think it should be.

Thanks and 73,
Jim N7CXI
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>