>
> On Jun 1, 2006, at 11:42 PM, David Hachadorian wrote:
>
>> What you, in your expensive high-tech bubble, think is a
>> clear run frequency, may actually be terrible, with loud
>> stations only 200 hz on both sides. Many S&P'ers are going
>> to tune right by you, because it appears to be an
>> undecipherable mishmash. If a run frequency doesn't sound
>> good with a pair of 500 Hz filters, it is probably not a
>> good frequency.
Bill wrote:
> I always thought you judged a frequency by the rate that it >produced,
> not by how it sounded.
> The band sounded terrible. S9 noise everywhere, very few signals.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I think there is a lot of difference between S9 noise and very few signals,
and 3 signals crammed into a 600 cycle portion of the spectrum I don't see
what this had to do with what Dave said. 73
Tom W7WHY
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|