Ken,
I stand corrected on the District of Columbia counting towards WAS.
I don't believe it is relevant to this discussion, however, as WAS is a
completely separate activity that comes out of a different office.
73,
Eric W3DQ
Washington, DC
"taxation, but no multiplier representation"
---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:11:55 -0700
>From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting DC as a Multiplier and Not as Part of
>>Maryland.
>To: w3dq@arrl.net
>Cc: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
>
>Eric,
>
> The District of Columbia _does_ count as Marlyand for Worked All >States.
>Just as the NAQP rules have an explicit statement about the District of
>Columbia ("District of Columbia counts as Maryland"), so too do the >rules for
>Worked All States ("The District of Columbia may be counted >for Maryland.")
>
>http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php?page=2
>http://www.arrl.org/awards/was/
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|